THE British Museum were credited with uncovering the fraud that led to the jailing of serial faker Shaun Greenhalgh two weeks ago, while auction houses and the trade were criticised for selling his work.
Now, however, as ATG columnist Richard Falkiner can reveal, it
was trade specialists who raised the alarm after the British Museum
had enthusiastically endorsed examples of Greenhalgh's work as
genuine, unwittingly giving him and his family the verification
they sought to pursue their fraud.
Mr Falkiner, who chairs the antiquities vetting committees at both
the Grosvenor House and Olympia fairs, and is consultant to auction
houses, dealers and collectors, first came across one of the
Greenhalgh fakes in early 2006 on a visit to Bonhams, where he
advises the antiquities department.
The prosecution in the Greenhalgh case reported how, having
examined three reliefs delivered to them on November 15, 2005 by
faker Shaun Greenhalgh's father George, the British Museum had
concluded that they were genuine.
In a letter to Greenhalgh senior dated the following day, the BM
confirmed that all the reliefs were Assyrian and from Nineveh. The
museum added that they were interested in acquiring one of them, a
stone relief showing a soldier and horses with cuneiform writing,
which matched a drawing by A.H. Layard in the BM collection. The
other two were later collected and taken to Bonhams for sale.
It was then that Bonhams' antiquities department showed one of the
submitted reliefs to Mr Falkiner. It was accompanied by a vague
provenance linking it to a catalogued sale at Silverton Park near
Exeter in December 1892. He was also shown the BM letter verifying
the relief as dating from 883-859BC and coming from Nimrud. A
further letter from the British Museum described the relief as "a
superb example of Assyrian art".
"I took one look at the relief and said 'don't make me laugh'," Mr
Falkiner told ATG. "It was an obvious fake. It was far too freshly
cut, was made of the wrong stone and was stylistically wrong for
At the time though, Mr Falkiner and Bonhams' head of antiquities,
Chantelle Waddingham, did not know whether it was a 19th century
fake or a modern one, so they took it to the British Museum to see
if there was anything similar from the 19th century stored in the
There they were told about the relief the museum had decided to
buy because it matched the Layard drawing.
Mr Falkiner and Ms Waddingham were suspicious of the coincidence
and queried whether the relief could be a fake created to match the
drawing, which had been published in detail in a book in
According to prosecution papers in the case, it was only then that
the British Museum explored this possibility and found that their
relief had a mistake in the cuneiform and the harness depicted on
the horses was of a modern design, not the traditional Assyrian
From there the Greenhalghs' web of fraud and deceit started to
unravel, culminating in their arrest following the exposure of the
fake Armana princess which Bolton Museum had acquired for £440,000
after the British Museum and Christie's had verified it in
Mr Falkiner said that he decided to make the revelations public
because he was unhappy that, far from being credited with their
contribution to exposing the fraud, Bonhams and the trade in
general had been criticised in the press for helping put fakes in
"People need to understand that trade specialists have a much
wider experience than museum specialists because they deal with a
far wider range of objects and fresh things pass through their
hands all the time," he said. "As this case shows, auction houses
play a key role in the detection of fakes and forgeries."
But he reserved his greatest criticism for the Greenhalghs
"This is not just a matter of greed. The Greenhalghs have made it
far more difficult for museums to approach the Art Fund and other
bodies for funding, because those who have fallen foul of the fakes
will have had their credibility dented."
The full range of fakes created by Shaun Greenhalgh may never be
known but, as well as antiquities, he is known to have produced
items as varied as paintings imitating the work of Colourist Samuel
Peploe, and the so-called Eadred Reliquary, a small silver object
containing a piece of wood thought to be a fragment of the True
The British Museum agreed to talk to ATG on the matter, but
despite a number of attempts to obtain a statement from them, none
was forthcoming at the time of going to press.
By Ivan Macquisten
Back to top